Mouthpiece Work / Re: Dukoff vs. Guardala [1 Attachment]
FROM: saxgourmet (STEVE GOODSON)
SUBJECT: Re: Dukoff vs. Guardala [1 Attachment]
I think these measurements are pretty standard in the machine tool business > On Dec 14, 2016, at 5:34 AM, johangjonker@... [MouthpieceWork] <MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > [Attachment(s) <x-msg://34/#TopText> from johangjonker@... <mailto:johangjonker@...> [MouthpieceWork] included below] > Hello Steve, > > I don't know why but the image is not shown in the web version. Maybe caused by the ":" sign in the name. I attached a renamed version. > Interesting for a lot of reasons. Hope that helps. > The way of measuring and drawing a mouthpiece is interesting. I think there are more items to measure but the set shows the most important ones. Is the drawing and the set base on a method? Is it the Sax Gourmet method or is it more common? > Btw: I have a parametric mouthpiece design now with over 50 parameters. But some of the are only cosmetic. > >
FROM: johangjonker@zonnet.nl ()
SUBJECT: Re: Dukoff vs. Guardala [1 Attachment]
Is the p_table; angle of the tabel also known?