Hi everyone,
 

 

 I am having trouble with constructing a proper clarinet mouthpiece facing. A clarinet facing is supposed to look like the one on the bottom in the attached file right? The one on the top one is the actual measurements of an mouthpiece of mine, so what I've tried to do on the bottom is to imagine what the top is supposed to look like without the low spots in the facing. Can any expert classical/orchestral clarinet mouthpiece refacers help me out? Is that what the mouthpiece facing originally intended to look like? Have I fixed it? What can I do to make it better?


Cheers,

Harim

 

An Excel graph assumes the measurements are equidistant from each other and will show discrepancies in a graph if they aren’t.

 

KenL

 

From: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 2:53 PM
To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [MouthpieceWork] classical/orchestral clarinet mouthpiece facing [1 Attachment]

 

  

[Attachment(s) from harim0suprem0@... [MouthpieceWork] included below] 

Hi everyone,

 

 

I am having trouble with constructing a proper clarinet mouthpiece facing. A clarinet facing is supposed to look like the one on the bottom in the attached file right? The one on the top one is the actual measurements of an mouthpiece of mine, so what I've tried to do on the bottom is to imagine what the top is supposed to look like without the low spots in the facing. Can any expert classical/orchestral clarinet mouthpiece refacers help me out? Is that what the mouthpiece facing originally intended to look like? Have I fixed it? What can I do to make it better?


Cheers,

Harim

 

This is only true fir some of the Excel graph types.  The XY graphs are the ones to use for plotting facing curves.

> On Feb 12, 2016, at 4:26 PM, 'Ken Lagace Photos' kenlphotos@... [MouthpieceWork] <MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> An Excel graph assumes the measurements are equidistant from each other and will show discrepancies in a graph if they aren’t.
> 
>  
> 
> KenL
> 
>  
> 
> From: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com] 
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 2:53 PM
> To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [MouthpieceWork] classical/orchestral clarinet mouthpiece facing [1 Attachment]
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> [Attachment(s) from harim0suprem0@... [MouthpieceWork] included below]
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> I am having trouble with constructing a proper clarinet mouthpiece facing. A clarinet facing is supposed to look like the one on the bottom in the attached file right? The one on the top one is the actual measurements of an mouthpiece of mine, so what I've tried to do on the bottom is to imagine what the top is supposed to look like without the low spots in the facing. Can any expert classical/orchestral clarinet mouthpiece refacers help me out? Is that what the mouthpiece facing originally intended to look like? Have I fixed it? What can I do to make it better?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Harim
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 

There is some data presented here you can plot and analyze.

http://www.clarinetxpress.com/facings.html

> On Feb 12, 2016, at 2:52 PM, harim0suprem0@yahoo.com [MouthpieceWork] <MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> [Attachment(s) from harim0suprem0@... [MouthpieceWork] included below]
> Hi everyone,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I am having trouble with constructing a proper clarinet mouthpiece facing. A clarinet facing is supposed to look like the one on the bottom in the attached file right? The one on the top one is the actual measurements of an mouthpiece of mine, so what I've tried to do on the bottom is to imagine what the top is supposed to look like without the low spots in the facing. Can any expert classical/orchestral clarinet mouthpiece refacers help me out? Is that what the mouthpiece facing originally intended to look like? Have I fixed it? What can I do to make it better?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Harim
> 
> 
> 
>