FROM: charvel50 (charvel50)
SUBJECT: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
I've just taken an old Conn Eagle Alto piece from 55 thou tip to 80 thou tip. Fortunately there was enough material to do this. I have given the piece a small roll over being carefull not to leave the roll over to high. The piece is still basically all chamber with hugely rounded side walls.
I have never worked on one of these before.
This piece is to be used with a 1920's Conn.

On a Mk6 alto the piece plays well over the horn even in to the harmonics. Great bottom end and not a bad sound but is extremely very dull. 

Is this normal? 

If I took the roll over down to basically nothing , would it liven the piece up? 

Cheers to all.

Ross


FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
I would suggest that it needs more baffle, not less.  Opening a tip makes the sound darker so making a rool-over out of the roof material is a good thing to start with.  Try a gentle arched baffle made out of temporary putty.  You could fill in the sides too, but then it will be like other straight-walled mouthpieces.  So do this just for the trial experience to see how significant the change is.



      
FROM: charvel50 (Ross and Helen McIntyre)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
Thanks for the reply Keith.
Are these pieces generally like this?
This one had no baffle in it to start with.

Ross McIntyre
saxman.com.au
FROM: frymorgan (Morgan)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
To a certain extent that's just the sound of these pieces.  The chamber is so large (even larger now that you've opened it a lot) and so steep you'll never get a modern (i.e. post 1930s) jazz sound out of it without adding material.  The baffle is too short, and for the chamber width the floor is too steep.  

--- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "charvel50" <mk6sax@...> wrote:
>
> I've just taken an old Conn Eagle Alto piece from 55 thou tip to 80 thou tip. Fortunately there was enough material to do this. I have given the piece a small roll over being carefull not to leave the roll over to high. The piece is still basically all chamber with hugely rounded side walls.
> I have never worked on one of these before.
> This piece is to be used with a 1920's Conn.
> 
> On a Mk6 alto the piece plays well over the horn even in to the harmonics. Great bottom end and not a bad sound but is extremely very dull. 
> 
> Is this normal? 
> 
> If I took the roll over down to basically nothing , would it liven the piece up? 
> 
> Cheers to all.
> 
> Ross
>



FROM: charvel50 (Ross and Helen McIntyre)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
Thanks for the comments, Morgan.
It is also what I have found. I just needed to know that they are like that.
Thanks.
Ross
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
Yes, they were designed for a different era and sound concept than what is needed for today's music.
 
Mojo Mouthpiece Work LLC
2925 Crane St., Vineland, NJ 08361 
Paypal to sabradbury79@... 
Check out: http://www.MojoMouthpieceWork.com




________________________________
From: Ross and Helen McIntyre <mk6sax@...>
To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 9:07:38 PM
Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece

  
Thanks for the reply Keith.
Are these pieces generally like this?
This one had no baffle in it to start with.
 
Ross McIntyre
saxman.com.au