Mouthpiece Work / Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
FROM: charvel50 (charvel50)
SUBJECT: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
I've just taken an old Conn Eagle Alto piece from 55 thou tip to 80 thou tip. Fortunately there was enough material to do this. I have given the piece a small roll over being carefull not to leave the roll over to high. The piece is still basically all chamber with hugely rounded side walls. I have never worked on one of these before. This piece is to be used with a 1920's Conn. On a Mk6 alto the piece plays well over the horn even in to the harmonics. Great bottom end and not a bad sound but is extremely very dull. Is this normal? If I took the roll over down to basically nothing , would it liven the piece up? Cheers to all. Ross
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
I would suggest that it needs more baffle, not less. Opening a tip makes the sound darker so making a rool-over out of the roof material is a good thing to start with. Try a gentle arched baffle made out of temporary putty. You could fill in the sides too, but then it will be like other straight-walled mouthpieces. So do this just for the trial experience to see how significant the change is.
FROM: charvel50 (Ross and Helen McIntyre)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
Thanks for the reply Keith. Are these pieces generally like this? This one had no baffle in it to start with. Ross McIntyre saxman.com.au
FROM: frymorgan (Morgan)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
To a certain extent that's just the sound of these pieces. The chamber is so large (even larger now that you've opened it a lot) and so steep you'll never get a modern (i.e. post 1930s) jazz sound out of it without adding material. The baffle is too short, and for the chamber width the floor is too steep. --- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "charvel50" <mk6sax@...> wrote: > > I've just taken an old Conn Eagle Alto piece from 55 thou tip to 80 thou tip. Fortunately there was enough material to do this. I have given the piece a small roll over being carefull not to leave the roll over to high. The piece is still basically all chamber with hugely rounded side walls. > I have never worked on one of these before. > This piece is to be used with a 1920's Conn. > > On a Mk6 alto the piece plays well over the horn even in to the harmonics. Great bottom end and not a bad sound but is extremely very dull. > > Is this normal? > > If I took the roll over down to basically nothing , would it liven the piece up? > > Cheers to all. > > Ross >
FROM: charvel50 (Ross and Helen McIntyre)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
Thanks for the comments, Morgan. It is also what I have found. I just needed to know that they are like that. Thanks. Ross
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece
Yes, they were designed for a different era and sound concept than what is needed for today's music. Mojo Mouthpiece Work LLC 2925 Crane St., Vineland, NJ 08361 Paypal to sabradbury79@... Check out: http://www.MojoMouthpieceWork.com ________________________________ From: Ross and Helen McIntyre <mk6sax@...> To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 9:07:38 PM Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Conn Eagle Alto Mouthpiece Thanks for the reply Keith. Are these pieces generally like this? This one had no baffle in it to start with. Ross McIntyre saxman.com.au