Mouthpiece Work / 2 questions, windows and Bergs
FROM: shamasian001 (shamasian001)
SUBJECT: 2 questions, windows and Bergs
My first question is what does it mean to "undercut" the window? My second question is about a Berg i have. It is a 105/2 M. The sound up high is good but the mid and low range is barky and does not speak well. I am guessing this has mostly to do with the baffle. Does anyone have experience working on Bergs with some advice on how i could even out the sound throughout all registers? Maybe if i take the baffle down a bit that would help? Thanks
FROM: dantorosian (Dan Torosian)
SUBJECT: Re: 2 questions, windows and Bergs
This html message parsed with html2text ---------------------------First, measure the facing curve. If it has uneven rails, flat spots, high spots, etc., it's probably not responding too well. DT shamasian001 wrote: > My first question is what does it mean to "undercut" the window? My second > question is about a Berg i have. It is a 105/2 M. The sound up high is good > but the mid and low range is barky and does not speak well. I am guessing > this has mostly to do with the baffle. Does anyone have experience working > on Bergs with some advice on how i could even out the sound throughout all > registers? Maybe if i take the baffle down a bit that would help? Thanks > >
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: 2 questions, windows and Bergs
--- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "shamasian001" <shamasian001@...> wrote: > > My first question is what does it mean to "undercut" the window? Take a look at the Wyman paper. It is a large pdf file on the Yahoo Mouthpiece Work site. See the dicussion around fig. 46 and fig. 60. "W:C" in fig. 46 is "undercutting". Discussion on fig. 45 talks about lengthening the window a little.