Mouthpiece Work / Tuning
FROM: perksjim (perksjim)
SUBJECT: Tuning
Hi team, Been reading your excellent comments! I have a problem with tuning the mouthpiece (chamber size, etc) The consensus seems to be: tune the low notes with chamber size and the high notes with mouthpiece position on the neck. IIUC, theory does not confirm this. Nederveen, pg 39, shows a conic instrument whose frequency is affected by mouthpiece volume (chamber size). High frequencies are greatly influenced, but low frequencies hardly affected at all! We know that mouthpiece position affects high notes more than low notes (percentage) and that affect is probably the same in both registers. Based on this theory, it seems to me that: 1. Set the mouthpiece position for the correct frequency for a middle-of-the-register note. 2. Tune the octaves to second harmonic with the chamber size, resetting 1. 3. With the octaves harmonic and the middle note in tune, play the horn low register over its range. If the scale is too out of tune to be easily adjusted by the player, try a different sax. What am I misunderstanding? jim
FROM: gregwier (Greg Wier)
SUBJECT: Re: Tuning
Try the unlisted #4 option: 4)Buy a decent quality chormatic tuner and uncomplicate matters. --- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "perksjim" <mcbop@...> wrote: > > > Hi team, > > Been reading your excellent comments! > > I have a problem with tuning the mouthpiece (chamber size, etc) > > The consensus seems to be: tune the low notes with chamber size > > and the high notes with mouthpiece position on the neck. > > IIUC, theory does not confirm this. > > Nederveen, pg 39, shows a conic instrument whose frequency is > > affected by mouthpiece volume (chamber size). High frequencies > > are greatly influenced, but low frequencies hardly affected at all! > > We know that mouthpiece position affects high notes more than > > low notes (percentage) and that affect is probably the same in both > > registers. > > Based on this theory, it seems to me that: > > 1. Set the mouthpiece position for the correct frequency > > for a middle-of-the-register note. > > 2. Tune the octaves to second harmonic with the chamber > size, > > resetting 1. > > 3. With the octaves harmonic and the middle note in tune, > > play the horn low register over its range. If the > scale > > is too out of tune to be easily adjusted by the > player, > > try a different sax. > > > > What am I misunderstanding? > > jim >
FROM: ez_mpc (Ed)
SUBJECT: Re: Tuning
Greg - Is it better if the tuner is powered by a replaceable battery or an AC adapter? Thanks... - Ed --- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "Greg Wier" <gregwier@...> wrote: > > Try the unlisted #4 option: > > 4)Buy a decent quality chormatic tuner and uncomplicate matters. >
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Tuning
> Nederveen, pg 39, shows a conic instrument whose frequency is > affected by mouthpiece volume (chamber size). I do not have this ref. I was wondering how the chamber volume was changed? Was it changed by making the mouthpiece region larger in diameter, longer in length, or a combination of both? I believe chamber volume does effect the entire range of the sax. I think you can test it this way. Start with a large chambered mouthpiece and mark the cork where you tuned it. Then add putty inside it and place it back on the cork mark. Now check the sax range with a tuner. The entire sax should be sharp. I do not know how uniform the change will be. Now if you pull it out to tune it with the putty in the mouthpiece you will be changing the length and making the chamber volume larger. I think when you tune the mid-range, you will end up very close to your starting chamber volume without the putty. Length effects the entire sax range too, but effects the short cone notes more than the long cone notes. So by trading off between length and volume you can alter the octave tuning. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
FROM: moeaaron (Barry Levine)
SUBJECT: Re: Tuning
It's better, and less complicated, if the saxophonist's tuner is located in the ears and the brain. Let the guitarists and bassists use the electronic tuners, it saves THEM alot of time and keeps them in line, that's for sure. Re the earlier discussion on "artificial mouthpieces", IMO the main practical use of that datum, the "natural frequency" of mouthpieces for the different saxes, (however questionably it may have been derived) seems to be that they are the useful notes for doing mouthpiece exercises, in order to learn what a good balance between air support and embouchure support feels like. Which one needs in order play well, and in tune. BL On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:08:38 -0000 "Ed" <edzentera@...> wrote: >Greg - > >Is it better if the tuner is powered by a replaceable >battery or an AC >adapter? > >Thanks... > >- Ed > >--- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "Greg Wier" ><gregwier@...> wrote: >> >> Try the unlisted #4 option: >> >> 4)Buy a decent quality chormatic tuner and uncomplicate >>matters. >> > >
FROM: gregwier (Greg Wier)
SUBJECT: Re: Tuning
The first consideration when establishing good intonation should answer this question: Is the horn leak free? Before you do anything to the mouthpiece be sure leaks are not affecting pitch. For those of us not possessing the gift of perfect pitch using a tuner and regular practice of long tones holding a steady pitch is good training to a more refined ear. One of my favorite tuning exercises is octave slurs both with and without the tuner. If you have to alter the chamber of your mouthpiece to play in tune perhaps it is not the ideal mouthpiece for your saxophone. Ed, the power source doesn't matter, but in honor of Earth day, let's put your ee degree to use and give us a solar power tuner. It may need a battery backup for cloudy days. When you make a fortune, remember whose idea it was.