Mouthpiece Work / clarinet mouthpiece "Brilhart Tonalin 3*"
FROM: eric_wurbel (Eric Würbel)
SUBJECT: clarinet mouthpiece "Brilhart Tonalin 3*"
Hello listers and mouthpieces workers I'm a subscriber of this for several months now, and just spent this time reading all the very instructive posts of this list. I just quickly present myself before going on with my question. I'm an amateur clarinetist (about 30 years of clar behind me), amateur metal clarinet addict (I overhauled a couple of instruments) , and amateur instrument builder (I build bamboo saxophones, designing my own mouthpieces, crafted in bamboo and wood). My question is : I have an old Brilhart Tonalin 3* clarinet mouthpiece which is almost unplayable. There is no apparent dammage on the mouthpiece, so I suspect that it has been very badly refaced. Does somebody have measurements of the facing of these mouthpieces, so I can compare to the actual facing and eventually take appropriate refacing decisions for it ? Thank you in advance Eric -- http://www.vents-sauvages.fr/
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: clarinet mouthpiece "Brilhart Tonalin 3*"
There is no real standard for Brilhart facings that I can tell. Every one is different. Some are good, some are bad. I would recommend you take measurements off a good playing clarinet mouthpiece you have and try an make the Brilhart close to those targets. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
FROM: eric_wurbel (Eric Würbel)
SUBJECT: Re: clarinet mouthpiece "Brilhart Tonalin 3*"
Le samedi 01 mars 2008 à 19:10 -0800, Keith Bradbury a écrit : > There is no real standard for Brilhart facings that I can tell. Every > one > is different. Some are good, some are bad. > > I would recommend you take measurements off a good playing clarinet > mouthpiece you have and try an make the Brilhart close to those > targets. Thank you for the answer Keith. I go back to basic work : measure, measure, measure ;-) Eric -- http://www.vents-sauvages.fr/
FROM: keith29236 (Edward McLean)
SUBJECT: Re: clarinet mouthpiece "Brilhart Tonalin 3*"
--- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, Eric Würbel <eric@...> wrote: > > Hello listers and mouthpieces workers > > I'm a subscriber of this for several months now, and just spent this > time reading all the very instructive posts of this list. > > I just quickly present myself before going on with my question. I'm an > amateur clarinetist (about 30 years of clar behind me), amateur metal > clarinet addict (I overhauled a couple of instruments) , and amateur > instrument builder (I build bamboo saxophones, designing my own > mouthpieces, crafted in bamboo and wood). > > My question is : I have an old Brilhart Tonalin 3* clarinet mouthpiece > which is almost unplayable. There is no apparent dammage on the > mouthpiece, so I suspect that it has been very badly refaced. > > Does somebody have measurements of the facing of these mouthpieces, so I > can compare to the actual facing and eventually take appropriate > refacing decisions for it ? > > Thank you in advance > > Eric > -- > http://www.vents-sauvages.fr/ > Hello Eric, It may be of only academic interest to know the Brilhart 3* was .045" tip and .594" length (15mm) All the * numbers were of this length, given that the tips went from 39 to 58. Very short by comparison with other makes. The plain numbered (I.E. no * ) 'pieces had the same tip openings, but were all .687" in length. Eddie
FROM: eric_wurbel (Eric Würbel)
SUBJECT: Re: clarinet mouthpiece "Brilhart Tonalin 3*"
Le lundi 03 mars 2008 à 16:25 +0000, Edward McLean a écrit : > Hello Eric, It may be of only academic interest to know the Brilhart > 3* was .045" tip and .594" length (15mm) All the * numbers were of > this length, given that the tips went from 39 to 58. Very short by > comparison with other makes. The plain numbered (I.E. no * ) 'pieces > had the same tip openings, but were all .687" in length. Eddie Thank you Edward. This is more than academically interresting ! At least it confirms me that the mouthpiece have been (very badly) refaced. Eric -- http://www.vents-sauvages.fr/