Mouthpiece Work / Tip t' baffle t' chamber relation?
FROM: maddahorn (maddahorn)
SUBJECT: Tip t' baffle t' chamber relation?
I'd like to open a tip on a mpce. For an ex. from an opening of 0.090" to 0.100" tenor. Obviously there is a limit to how much mat'l can be removed to accomodate this change. How critical is the the transition angle of the tip/baffle too chamber? In other words as I've seen in some mpces where the baffle is fairly prominent and then it drops with a steeper angle into the chamber and some more gradual. I want as big and fat a sound coming out of my horn but controllable. Keith if you are reading this, you mentioned in my other query about the tip opening process, that you lengthen the facing curve with the opening of the tip, how do you judge how much to lengthen using my example? If you were to cut the mouthpiece in half and viewed this profile of a well playing mpce, from tip over a baffle, how much "headroom" would there be above the top of the baffle to the facing for a free blowing mpce with little resistance?
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Tip t' baffle t' chamber relation?
--- maddahorn <fmarych@...> wrote: > I'd like to open a tip on a mpce. For an ex. from an opening of 0.090" > to 0.100" tenor. Obviously there is a limit to how much mat'l can be > removed to accomodate this change. How critical is the the transition > angle of the tip/baffle too chamber? In other words as I've seen in > some mpces where the baffle is fairly prominent and then it drops with > a steeper angle into the chamber and some more gradual. I want as big > and fat a sound coming out of my horn but controllable. > > Keith if you are reading this, you mentioned in my other query about > the tip opening process, that you lengthen the facing curve with the > opening of the tip, how do you judge how much to lengthen using my > example? It depends on where you are starting from. If it is in the 44-48 range, I would add 2 numbers to it. If it was shorter, I might add 4, longer, keep it where it is. > > If you were to cut the mouthpiece in half and viewed this profile of a > well playing mpce, from tip over a baffle, how much "headroom" would > there be above the top of the baffle to the facing for a free blowing > mpce with little resistance? I would either roll-over the baffle near the tip rail or make a short straight baffle. When I gun site along the baffle from the tip, I like to be able to see at least 1/2 of the bore opening. Any higher and I feel it chokes off the sound some. Seeing the whole bore is a good target. > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
FROM: maddahorn (fred marych)
SUBJECT: Re: Tip t' baffle t' chamber relation?
Thanks again Keith. You've been very helpful. What a great site! ----- Original Message ----- From: Keith Bradbury To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Tip t' baffle t' chamber relation? --- maddahorn <fmarych@comcast.net> wrote: > I'd like to open a tip on a mpce. For an ex. from an opening of 0.090" > to 0.100" tenor. Obviously there is a limit to how much mat'l can be > removed to accomodate this change. How critical is the the transition > angle of the tip/baffle too chamber? In other words as I've seen in > some mpces where the baffle is fairly prominent and then it drops with > a steeper angle into the chamber and some more gradual. I want as big > and fat a sound coming out of my horn but controllable. > > Keith if you are reading this, you mentioned in my other query about > the tip opening process, that you lengthen the facing curve with the > opening of the tip, how do you judge how much to lengthen using my > example? It depends on where you are starting from. If it is in the 44-48 range, I would add 2 numbers to it. If it was shorter, I might add 4, longer, keep it where it is. > > If you were to cut the mouthpiece in half and viewed this profile of a > well playing mpce, from tip over a baffle, how much "headroom" would > there be above the top of the baffle to the facing for a free blowing > mpce with little resistance? I would either roll-over the baffle near the tip rail or make a short straight baffle. When I gun site along the baffle from the tip, I like to be able to see at least 1/2 of the bore opening. Any higher and I feel it chokes off the sound some. Seeing the whole bore is a good target. > > > __________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
FROM: kymarto (kymarto123@...)
SUBJECT: Re: Tip t' baffle t' chamber relation?
I find it important to cut material away just behind the tip rail for free-blowingness. No matter how high the baffle is generally (and it is possibly more important if it is high), there needs to be a clear space just behind the tip rail--if you have this it improves response and makes the mpc much less likely to chirp with a minimal difference to the overall sound. At least this has been my experience. Toby fred marych <fmarych@...> wrote: Thanks again Keith. You've been very helpful. What a great site! ----- Original Message ----- From: Keith Bradbury To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Tip t' baffle t' chamber relation? --- maddahorn <fmarych@...> wrote: > I'd like to open a tip on a mpce. For an ex. from an opening of 0.090" > to 0.100" tenor. Obviously there is a limit to how much mat'l can be > removed to accomodate this change. How critical is the the transition > angle of the tip/baffle too chamber? In other words as I've seen in > some mpces where the baffle is fairly prominent and then it drops with > a steeper angle into the chamber and some more gradual. I want as big > and fat a sound coming out of my horn but controllable. > > Keith if you are reading this, you mentioned in my other query about > the tip opening process, that you lengthen the facing curve with the > opening of the tip, how do you judge how much to lengthen using my > example? It depends on where you are starting from. If it is in the 44-48 range, I would add 2 numbers to it. If it was shorter, I might add 4, longer, keep it where it is. > > If you were to cut the mouthpiece in half and viewed this profile of a > well playing mpce, from tip over a baffle, how much "headroom" would > there be above the top of the baffle to the facing for a free blowing > mpce with little resistance? I would either roll-over the baffle near the tip rail or make a short straight baffle. When I gun site along the baffle from the tip, I like to be able to see at least 1/2 of the bore opening. Any higher and I feel it chokes off the sound some. Seeing the whole bore is a good target. > > > __________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping