Mouthpiece Work / techniques for starting the facing curve
FROM: dcb_76 (dcb_76)
SUBJECT: techniques for starting the facing curve
I'm finding it very difficult to start my facing curve correctly. I tend to take too much material off at the very start of the curve, where the flat part of the table begins its radial climb to the tip. I imagine it is extremely important that the curve begin gradually, and yet it seems safer (and for me so far, more successful) to take off less material and let the curve start a but more abruptly. I mean this is the sense of not doing much (or any) removal between the start of the curve and where the .0015 measurement is taken. Any technique recommendations, or am I worrying about a relatively minor issue?
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: techniques for starting the facing curve
It is very easy to mess up the .0015" facing length. Then you get into the pattern of cutting down the table to get it back and messing it up again. I find it is best to leave the lengths short by 1-3 glass gage numbers until you get the rest of the facing curve done. Usually by the time I'm done, the facing length crept up close to target anyhow. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
FROM: bluesnote2000 (dan lunsford)
SUBJECT: Re: techniques for starting the facing curve
--- Keith Bradbury <kwbradbury@...> wrote: > It is very easy to mess up the .0015" facing length. > Then you get into the > pattern of cutting down the table to get it back and > messing it up again. > I find it is best to leave the lengths short by 1-3 > glass gage numbers > until you get the rest of the facing curve done. > Usually by the time I'm > done, the facing length crept up close to target > anyhow. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > Hi: That is a good idea. Maybe that's why Eric Brand kind of had a similar idea about the curve in general. By the way, any takers on my Berg Bari sax question which was: Do all metal Bergs have bullet chambers or do some ones over 2 or 3 have a step baffle like the tenor pieces? Thanks, Bob __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
FROM: tenorman1952 (tenorman@...)
SUBJECT: Re: techniques for starting the facing curve
I agree. ------- Original Message ------- From : Keith Bradbury[mailto:kwbradbury@...] Sent : 6/15/2006 6:35:18 AM To : MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com Cc : Subject : RE: Re: [MouthpieceWork] techniques for starting the facing curve It is very easy to mess up the .0015" facing length. Then you get into the pattern of cutting down the table to get it back and messing it up again. I find it is best to leave the lengths short by 1-3 glass gage numbers until you get the rest of the facing curve done. Usually by the time I'm done, the facing length crept up close to target anyhow. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
FROM: dcb_76 (dcb_76)
SUBJECT: Re: techniques for starting the facing curve
Thanks. I'll try this out (since I've now re-flattened my table!). --- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, Keith Bradbury <kwbradbury@...> wrote: > > It is very easy to mess up the .0015" facing length. Then you get into the > pattern of cutting down the table to get it back and messing it up again. > I find it is best to leave the lengths short by 1-3 glass gage numbers > until you get the rest of the facing curve done. Usually by the time I'm > done, the facing length crept up close to target anyhow. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >