Mouthpiece Work / Guardala Brecker 1 Tenor.
FROM: charvel50 (charvel50)
SUBJECT: Guardala Brecker 1 Tenor.
I recently noted that My Guardala was approx 1mm out in the height of the rails near the tip. I have since balanced the rails and baffle ( very carefully on the latter). The piece is now nearly back to its former glory. It does not chirp any more as it used to on occassions. The lay now reads as follows> 0015 24mm 005 19.8 010 17 020 14 030 12 040 10 050 8 060 6.5 070 5 080 3.5 090 2 100 1 The 0015 is 24.5 on one side and 24 on the other. The rest are perfectly balanced. Could anyone advise me on 1. is this curve OK or can it be improved? Will fixing the difference at 0015 make the playability any better? Thank you regards Ross McIntyre
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Guardala Brecker 1 Tenor.
I finally got around to analyzing this curve. I posted it in the Files - Tenor Sax area as RM_Guardala. I put an elliptical curve of best fit through the points. I think low note response would be improved if you lengthened the .005", .010" and .020" readings closer to my goal curve. --- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "charvel50" <rossmac1@c...> wrote: > I recently noted that My Guardala was approx 1mm out in the height of > the rails near the tip. I have since balanced the rails and baffle ( > very carefully on the latter). The piece is now nearly back to its > former glory. It does not chirp any more as it used to on occassions. > The lay now reads as follows> > 0015 24mm > 005 19.8 > 010 17 > 020 14 > 030 12 > 040 10 > 050 8 > 060 6.5 > 070 5 > 080 3.5 > 090 2 > 100 1 > The 0015 is 24.5 on one side and 24 on the other. The rest are > perfectly balanced. > > Could anyone advise me on 1. is this curve OK or can it be improved? > Will fixing the difference at 0015 make the playability any better? > Thank you > regards > Ross McIntyre
FROM: charvel50 (charvel50)
SUBJECT: Re: Guardala Brecker 1 Tenor.
Many thanks for your time and input Keith