Mouthpiece Work / New to this stuff
FROM: cumkwatcheesemuffin (cumkwatcheesemuffin)
SUBJECT: New to this stuff
Hi, I've been a member, but I don't think I have ever posted anything! I don't know anything about refacing or repair, but I am interested in learning more about basic mpc repair before I get into refacing. Is there a website that has all the basics on it? Like tools, where to start, etc? Does repair seem fairly easy and is it a good place to start? Thanks a bunch, Bonnie White
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: New to this stuff
> Is there a website that has all the basics on it? Like tools, where > to start, etc? Does repair seem fairly easy and is it a good place > to start? > The information on this site is the most complete collection of mouthpiece information there is. Look through the Messages, Files, Links and Photos. It is organized in a step-by-step way, but most of what you need is already here. You can ask questions about what you can not find. I think the best way to get started is by using a temporary putty to make various baffle shapes in a test mouthpiece. This can be done without damaging a mouthpiece. Later, you can progress to using epoxy putties to make more permanent baffles. Tooth deck repair is another area a beginner can work at without damaging a facing. Shank crack banding is another one. Chip and nick repair usually requires some facing skills. There are three things you need to do to get started with refacing: Measure, measure, and measure. You'll need glass guage, feeler guages, and a way to measure tip openings (wand, calipers, or depth guage). You need to be able to measure the same piece and get the same results, within reason. Otherwise you will be trying to correct facing defects that may just be you measurement errors. I think spent about 6 months measuring and plotting facing curves before I reworked my first piece. This amount of time is not neccessary, but I was really interested in studying the various curve shapes. I eventually concluded that most of the odd shapes I was studying were manufacturing defects, not mouthpiece features.