Mouthpiece Work / Contour gauge
FROM: spr1ng64 (Patrick)
SUBJECT: Contour gauge
Does anyone here use one of these for analyzing the shape of a baffle? I am having a little trouble "seeing" baffles and I think this would help immensely! It wouldn't work as well for the lay but for the baffle I know of no other way to really measure the beast...
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Contour gauge
I used one for a while. I would take caliper measurements of a mouthpiece wherever I could. On the back of my data sheet I would trace the profile of the baffle centerline (taken through the window) with the contour gauge. The trace is very crude, took time, and I ended up never using them. There just is no fast, easy, accurate, inexpensive way to capture the shapes inside a mouthpiece. The best I can do is take a few caliper measurments on the length and depth of a wedge, step, or bullet baffle. I eyeball the interior and make some general notes on what I see. If anyone has some good methods for this area, I'd like to hear them too. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
FROM: bigbadbaritom (bigbadbaritom)
SUBJECT: Re: Contour gauge
the problem is how does one recreate the baffle of a mouthpiece. what i ended up doing was buying a contour gauge from micromark , copying the baffle of a favourite mouthpiece from the contour gauge onto a piece of paper ,and then re-copying from the paper onto a piece of 3mm lexan(plexiglass). i then cut out the baffle shape leaving a little extra on the contour line .the next thing i did was to slowly remove matierial from the lexan until it finally matched up to the baffle. some things i found usefull : (1) when using the contour gauge take an impression of the full length of the mouthpiece down the center. (2) make the lexan follow this whole contour impression ,from the table to the tip.(3) at the tip end in a hook shape so it lines up with the tip of a mouthpiece. this is a time consuming process so i've only done this with a few baffles which i thought to be some of the best i've encountered. this isn't the most scientific method but i think it helps me to be on the right track to produce a good baffle shape. anyway , thats my 2 cents Tom <kwbradbury@y...> wrote: > I used one for a while. I would take caliper measurements of a mouthpiece > wherever I could. On the back of my data sheet I would trace the profile > of the baffle centerline (taken through the window) with the contour gauge. > > The trace is very crude, took time, and I ended up never using them. There > just is no fast, easy, accurate, inexpensive way to capture the shapes > inside a mouthpiece. The best I can do is take a few caliper measurments > on the length and depth of a wedge, step, or bullet baffle. I eyeball the > interior and make some general notes on what I see. > > If anyone has some good methods for this area, I'd like to hear them too. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. > http://photos.yahoo.com/