FROM: mikeruhl (Mike Ruhl <mikeruhl@...>)
SUBJECT: Alignment of reed tip to bore
I clipped the following from the description of the Hite 129 baritone 
sax mouthpiece, out on the J&D Hite website 
(http://www.jdhite.com/mouthpieces/saxmpc.htm):

"...The table is angled in such a way that the tip of the reed is 
centered on the bore of the mouthpiece. This improved design gives 
the bari a rich lean sound rather than the old style spread, heavy 
tone. Both high and low registers are enhanced, and tonal flexibility 
is facilitated."

Does the alignment of the reed tip in relationship to the bore really 
have a noticeable effect?  Has anyone experimented with this?


FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Yes.  Wyman experimented with alto mouthpieces and found some benefits to
the reed tip being nearer to the centerline of the bore.  Some of my
favorite mouthpieces have this feature to (Quantum, for one).  

I have a Link on the MP Work site to where you can order his paper.  It is
primarily an emperical study of different mouthpiece features.  He did a
really nice job with it and it is easy to read.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

FROM: kymarto (Toby)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Sounds like hype to me. There is only a very slight effect from things like the bow curve in a sax, so how could this make any difference?

Toby
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mike Ruhl <mikeruhl@...> 
  To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 5:20 AM
  Subject: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore


  I clipped the following from the description of the Hite 129 baritone 
  sax mouthpiece, out on the J&D Hite website 
  (http://www.jdhite.com/mouthpieces/saxmpc.htm):

  "...The table is angled in such a way that the tip of the reed is 
  centered on the bore of the mouthpiece. This improved design gives 
  the bari a rich lean sound rather than the old style spread, heavy 
  tone. Both high and low registers are enhanced, and tonal flexibility 
  is facilitated."

  Does the alignment of the reed tip in relationship to the bore really 
  have a noticeable effect?  Has anyone experimented with this?


  Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com

  Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.

  To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
FROM: kymarto (Toby)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Really? I wonder what causes that....

Toby
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Bradbury 
  To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:34 AM
  Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore


  Yes.  Wyman experimented with alto mouthpieces and found some benefits to
  the reed tip being nearer to the centerline of the bore.  Some of my
  favorite mouthpieces have this feature to (Quantum, for one).  

  I have a Link on the MP Work site to where you can order his paper.  It is
  primarily an emperical study of different mouthpiece features.  He did a
  really nice job with it and it is easy to read.

  __________________________________________________
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
  http://mailplus.yahoo.com

  Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com

  Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.

  To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
I'll have to re-read his paper to see if he speculated why it was
significant.  I think it more closely approximates the missing part of the
sax cone.  I'm not sure if the paper said that or I thought of it.

But like you said, the sound goes through several contortions in a sax. 
Hard to believe this would matter.  But the data says it does (a little).

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

FROM: kymarto (Toby)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Hi Keith,

I wonder what sort of controls he used. Knowing how significant bore dimensions are I think it would be hard to reproduce them exactly with two different table angles. One would have to test a whole slew of mpcs and do some statistical analysis in that case. 

I read that when the air column does a big curve like in the bow it changes the speed of the waves in the torus--reelatively slows them down I think I remember (the math is horrendous). To compensate the diameter needs to be contracted slighty. It would be interesting to know how the air column vibrations propagate at the tip--as we are going from a flat plane to a cylinder as the pulsations develop across the baffle and into the chamber.Perhaps there is something in there that is significant vis-a-vis having the "flat plane" of the tip in line with the cylinder of the throat. Still my guess is that whatever effect is observed would have more to do with volume than geometry. Gasses don't know anything about angles, they just fill whatever volume is availabe with an even distribution of molecules. But I don't really know enough about fluid dynamics...

Toby
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Bradbury 
  To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:34 AM
  Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore


  I'll have to re-read his paper to see if he speculated why it was
  significant.  I think it more closely approximates the missing part of the
  sax cone.  I'm not sure if the paper said that or I thought of it.

  But like you said, the sound goes through several contortions in a sax. 
  Hard to believe this would matter.  But the data says it does (a little).

  __________________________________________________
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
  http://mailplus.yahoo.com

  Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com

  Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.

  To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
FROM: reidalf (Alf Reid [AST VT])
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
           In my opinion the major effect will come from the change in playing angle. The playing angle for sure has a effect
          on sound. This geometry will suit me perfectly as I like to play with the sax ahead of me close to the centre of
           my body. On regular mouthpieces it darkens the sound giving a heavy tone, as one cant get under the reed enough
           to form the perfect embrouchure.   
            
           The opposite geometry works well on straight soprano . (tip far away from centre of bore)
 
            Much of the sound difference might thus be attributed to how COMFORTABLE the angle is.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Ruhl <mikeruhl@...> [mailto:mikeruhl@...]
Sent: 06 February 2003 22:20
To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore


I clipped the following from the description of the Hite 129 baritone 
sax mouthpiece, out on the J&D Hite website 
( http://www.jdhite.com/mouthpieces/saxmpc.htm):

"...The table is angled in such a way that the tip of the reed is 
centered on the bore of the mouthpiece. This improved design gives 
the bari a rich lean sound rather than the old style spread, heavy 
tone. Both high and low registers are enhanced, and tonal flexibility 
is facilitated."

Does the alignment of the reed tip in relationship to the bore really 
have a noticeable effect?  Has anyone experimented with this?


Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com

Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.

To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 



______________________________________________

"This information is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and 
may contain private, confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material and may be subject
to confidentiality agreements.

Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or any other use of or taking of any action in
reliance upon this information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient,
is prohibited. 

If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all 
storage media.

The company is neither liable for proper, complete transmission of the information contained
in this communication, any delay in its receipt or that the mail is virus-free"
FROM: mikeruhl (Mike Ruhl)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Received the following yesterday, in an email from Dr. Wyman, in response to 
my asking how to obtain a copy of his Ph.D. dissertation:

"Michael...  you can obtain a copy over the internet...

go to       www.umi.com

click on "Dissertation Services"

click on "Dissertation Express"

It is item number 7224955

Best wishes,    Laurence Wyman"


>From: "Toby" <kymarto@...>
>Reply-To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
>To: <MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore
>Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:20:15 +0900
>
>Hi Keith,
>
>I wonder what sort of controls he used. Knowing how significant bore 
>dimensions are I think it would be hard to reproduce them exactly with two 
>different table angles. One would have to test a whole slew of mpcs and do 
>some statistical analysis in that case.
>
>I read that when the air column does a big curve like in the bow it changes 
>the speed of the waves in the torus--reelatively slows them down I think I 
>remember (the math is horrendous). To compensate the diameter needs to be 
>contracted slighty. It would be interesting to know how the air column 
>vibrations propagate at the tip--as we are going from a flat plane to a 
>cylinder as the pulsations develop across the baffle and into the 
>chamber.Perhaps there is something in there that is significant vis-a-vis 
>having the "flat plane" of the tip in line with the cylinder of the throat. 
>Still my guess is that whatever effect is observed would have more to do 
>with volume than geometry. Gasses don't know anything about angles, they 
>just fill whatever volume is availabe with an even distribution of 
>molecules. But I don't really know enough about fluid dynamics...
>
>Toby
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Keith Bradbury
>   To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:34 AM
>   Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore
>
>
>   I'll have to re-read his paper to see if he speculated why it was
>   significant.  I think it more closely approximates the missing part of 
>the
>   sax cone.  I'm not sure if the paper said that or I thought of it.
>
>   But like you said, the sound goes through several contortions in a sax.
>   Hard to believe this would matter.  But the data says it does (a 
>little).
>
>   __________________________________________________
>   Do you Yahoo!?
>   Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
>   http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>
>   Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to 
>MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
>
>   Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see 
>the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.
>
>   To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury <kwbradbury@...>)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
I guess you missed that I had all that info in the Links section:
>>>>
Dr. Laurence Wyman 
Sax Prof and refacer based in Fredonia, NY. Order his Alto MP Paper 
at http://www.umi.com #7224955. 
http://www.fredonia.edu/som/wyman/Page2.htm
<<<<

Wyman studied 12 mouthpieces emperically averaging the results from 
several players.  He recorded subjective comments of the players and 
also frequency spectrums.  He consulted with S. Rascher for 
suggestions on the scope of the study.  The paper (thesis) is almost 
200 pages.

He also explored several "one variable" tests by taking a single 
mouthpiece and modifying it.  He did this to study the bore-to-table 
angle.  Larger angles bring the tip closer to the bore centerline.  
He took a single mouthpiece and parted it at the shank so it could be 
tilted at two different angles.  He sealed the joint with silicone 
rubber.  "The increase of the angle made the tone quality more 
uniform in spectrum shape throughout the range and generally made for 
more richness of the tone by decreasing the energy of partials 2 and 
4 and increasing the energy of partial 3".  Earlier in the papre he 
explains more what he considerers desireable in a sound and how it 
relates to the frequency spectrums.  He further confirms his results 
by sorting his 12 test mouthpieces from smallest to largest bore-to-
table angle.  The small ones had a "certain degree of stuffiness 
experianced by the performer".  The largest one (A Brilhart Level 
Air) had an "extremely even tone quality".



FROM: kymarto (Toby)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Thanks Mike,

I've gotta admit I'm not real anxious to shell out $37 to read this, interesting though I'm sure it is.  If anyone gets a copy please let us know a bit about his methods and results.

Toby
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mike Ruhl 
  To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:28 PM
  Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore


  Received the following yesterday, in an email from Dr. Wyman, in response to 
  my asking how to obtain a copy of his Ph.D. dissertation:

  "Michael...  you can obtain a copy over the internet...

  go to       www.umi.com

  click on "Dissertation Services"

  click on "Dissertation Express"

  It is item number 7224955

  Best wishes,    Laurence Wyman"


  >From: "Toby" <kymarto@...>
  >Reply-To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
  >To: <MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com>
  >Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore
  >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:20:15 +0900
  >
  >Hi Keith,
  >
  >I wonder what sort of controls he used. Knowing how significant bore 
  >dimensions are I think it would be hard to reproduce them exactly with two 
  >different table angles. One would have to test a whole slew of mpcs and do 
  >some statistical analysis in that case.
  >
  >I read that when the air column does a big curve like in the bow it changes 
  >the speed of the waves in the torus--reelatively slows them down I think I 
  >remember (the math is horrendous). To compensate the diameter needs to be 
  >contracted slighty. It would be interesting to know how the air column 
  >vibrations propagate at the tip--as we are going from a flat plane to a 
  >cylinder as the pulsations develop across the baffle and into the 
  >chamber.Perhaps there is something in there that is significant vis-a-vis 
  >having the "flat plane" of the tip in line with the cylinder of the throat. 
  >Still my guess is that whatever effect is observed would have more to do 
  >with volume than geometry. Gasses don't know anything about angles, they 
  >just fill whatever volume is availabe with an even distribution of 
  >molecules. But I don't really know enough about fluid dynamics...
  >
  >Toby
  >   ----- Original Message -----
  >   From: Keith Bradbury
  >   To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
  >   Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:34 AM
  >   Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Alignment of reed tip to bore
  >
  >
  >   I'll have to re-read his paper to see if he speculated why it was
  >   significant.  I think it more closely approximates the missing part of 
  >the
  >   sax cone.  I'm not sure if the paper said that or I thought of it.
  >
  >   But like you said, the sound goes through several contortions in a sax.
  >   Hard to believe this would matter.  But the data says it does (a 
  >little).
  >
  >   __________________________________________________
  >   Do you Yahoo!?
  >   Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
  >   http://mailplus.yahoo.com
  >
  >   Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to 
  >MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com
  >
  >   Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see 
  >the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.
  >
  >   To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
  >
  >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


  _________________________________________________________________
  The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
  http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


  Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com

  Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.

  To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
FROM: kymarto (Toby)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Thanks Keith,

That's very interesting. As a dyed-in-the-wool skeptic I can't help but think however that twelve mpcs is not a very large sample. I also imagine that changing the angle of the split mpc couldn't help but change the chamber dimensions. Still, who am I to question a 200 page thesis of a Professor Emeritus of Saxophone? These things must have been brought up in his peer review.

I'm going to have a look at my mpc collection tomorrow and do my own little test....

Toby
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Bradbury <kwbradbury@...> 
  To: MouthpieceWork@...m 
  Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:53 AM
  Subject: [MouthpieceWork] Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore


  I guess you missed that I had all that info in the Links section:
  >>>>
  Dr. Laurence Wyman 
  Sax Prof and refacer based in Fredonia, NY. Order his Alto MP Paper 
  at http://www.umi.com #7224955. 
  http://www.fredonia.edu/som/wyman/Page2.htm
  <<<<

  Wyman studied 12 mouthpieces emperically averaging the results from 
  several players.  He recorded subjective comments of the players and 
  also frequency spectrums.  He consulted with S. Rascher for 
  suggestions on the scope of the study.  The paper (thesis) is almost 
  200 pages.

  He also explored several "one variable" tests by taking a single 
  mouthpiece and modifying it.  He did this to study the bore-to-table 
  angle.  Larger angles bring the tip closer to the bore centerline.  
  He took a single mouthpiece and parted it at the shank so it could be 
  tilted at two different angles.  He sealed the joint with silicone 
  rubber.  "The increase of the angle made the tone quality more 
  uniform in spectrum shape throughout the range and generally made for 
  more richness of the tone by decreasing the energy of partials 2 and 
  4 and increasing the energy of partial 3".  Earlier in the papre he 
  explains more what he considerers desireable in a sound and how it 
  relates to the frequency spectrums.  He further confirms his results 
  by sorting his 12 test mouthpieces from smallest to largest bore-to-
  table angle.  The small ones had a "certain degree of stuffiness 
  experianced by the performer".  The largest one (A Brilhart Level 
  Air) had an "extremely even tone quality".



  Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com

  Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.

  To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Toby, it sounds to me like you would really like to read this.  I'm sure
you have more money sunk into some mouthpieces you are not using.  Sell one
and get the paper.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

FROM: kymarto (Toby)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
Yeah, probably right Keith. 

Toby
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Bradbury 
  To: MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:04 AM
  Subject: Re: [MouthpieceWork] Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore


  Toby, it sounds to me like you would really like to read this.  I'm sure
  you have more money sunk into some mouthpieces you are not using.  Sell one
  and get the paper.

  __________________________________________________
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
  http://mailplus.yahoo.com

  Got a Mouthpiece Work question?  Send it to MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com

  Visit the site at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MouthpieceWork to see the Files, Photos and Bookmarks relating to Mouthpiece Work.

  To see and modify your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
FROM: dcb_76 (dcb_76)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
I found an old post about table-to-bore angle while digging about. I
was a clarinet player first and have always felt most comfortable
playing alto, soprano, and bari saxes, and least comfortable on tenor.
I noticed that these MP angles were always more "clarinet-like" than
my tenor, which gives me no end of trouble with respect to articulation.

I have experimented with the angle of the tenor MP in my mouth and
found tht the more "clarinet-like" the angle the easier to get the low
notes to speak, and the more clarinet like the tone (dark and ringing
as opposed to richer and somewhat diffuse). But physically It's very
uncomfortable to play like that (high angle) for long.

Can anyone provide a few pointers on which mouthpieces currently
available provide a high table-to-bore angle, making this easier?

--- In MouthpieceWork@yahoogroups.com, "Keith Bradbury
<kwbradbury@...>" <kwbradbury@...> wrote:
>
> I guess you missed that I had all that info in the Links section:
> >>>>
> Dr. Laurence Wyman 
> Sax Prof and refacer based in Fredonia, NY. Order his Alto MP Paper 
> at http://www.umi.com #7224955. 
> http://www.fredonia.edu/som/wyman/Page2.htm
> <<<<
> 
> Wyman studied 12 mouthpieces emperically averaging the results from 
> several players.  He recorded subjective comments of the players and 
> also frequency spectrums.  He consulted with S. Rascher for 
> suggestions on the scope of the study.  The paper (thesis) is almost 
> 200 pages.
> 
> He also explored several "one variable" tests by taking a single 
> mouthpiece and modifying it.  He did this to study the bore-to-table 
> angle.  Larger angles bring the tip closer to the bore centerline.  
> He took a single mouthpiece and parted it at the shank so it could be 
> tilted at two different angles.  He sealed the joint with silicone 
> rubber.  "The increase of the angle made the tone quality more 
> uniform in spectrum shape throughout the range and generally made for 
> more richness of the tone by decreasing the energy of partials 2 and 
> 4 and increasing the energy of partial 3".  Earlier in the papre he 
> explains more what he considerers desireable in a sound and how it 
> relates to the frequency spectrums.  He further confirms his results 
> by sorting his 12 test mouthpieces from smallest to largest bore-to-
> table angle.  The small ones had a "certain degree of stuffiness 
> experianced by the performer".  The largest one (A Brilhart Level 
> Air) had an "extremely even tone quality".
>






FROM: kwbradbury (Keith Bradbury)
SUBJECT: Re: Alignment of reed tip to bore
It sounds like you are more concerned with the angle of the mouthpiece to
your embouchure.  There used to be a tenor sax mouthpiece made that had a
angled shank bore attached the mouthpiece body.  It looked like a kink from
the side.  The ads ran in Sax Journal a lot.  

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com